New Yorker Is Released After Belfast Arson Trial
Date: 02 July 1971
Special to The New York Times
3-mo trial of NY press photographer J Stevens ends in Belfast ct when he is found not guilty of charges of arson and throwing fire bombs at Queens Univ
1971년 7월 1일 목요일 재생 중
1971년 7월 1일은(는) 목요일의 별 기호 아래에 있는 **♋**입니다. 올해의 181일이었습니다. 미국 대통령은 Richard M. Nixon입니다.
이 날에 태어났다면 당신은 55살입니다. 마지막 생일은 2026년 7월 1일 수요일, 13일 전이었습니다. 다음 생일은 2027년 7월 1일 목요일일 후 351입니다. 당신은 20,102일, 약 482,452시간, 약 28,947,141분 또는 약 1,736,828,460초 동안 살았습니다.
이 생일을 공유하는 사람들:
1st of July 1971 News
1971년 7월 1일 의 New York Times 1면에 실린 뉴스
Mitchell Will Prosecute Law Violations in Leaks; U.S. TO PROSECUTE ANY ILLEGAL LEAKS
Date: 02 July 1971
Special to The New York Times
Mitchell, in press release, says that Justice Dept continues probe of leak of Pentagon papers and pledges to prosecute anyone who has broken law; text; Rogers says he hopes that press will 'recognize obligation to refrain from publication of information' in papers that is harmful to security; says Govt will help identify documents that might do such harm; Times spokesman says that Times has taken natl security into acct at all times in editing and reptg documents; Rogers cannot answer query on whether plans for prosecution extend to editors and newsmen; 5 Sup Ct Justices, in yesterday's decision, mentioned possibility of criminal prosecution
Bar on Boston Globe Lifted
Date: 01 July 1971
Special to The New York Times
temporary restraining order barring Boston Globe from printing articles based on Pentagon papers lifted almost immediately after Sup Ct decision; Christian Science Monitor continues pub of such articles
ELLSBERG ASSERTS OTHERS AIDED HIM; Says They Helped Distribute Secret Data to All Papers That Printed Articles Ellsberg Says Others Helped Give Papers to Press
Date: 02 July 1971
By ROBERT REINHOLDSpecial to The New York Times
Ellsberg says that 'other individuals,' whom he will not identify, helped him in distributing to press Pentagon papers; says he was primary source for all newspapers that have published articles on papers; says that during 10 days he disappeared before his arrest he made sure papers were delivered to press throughout country; holds he had begun to fear that his plans would be thwarted by Govt efforts to bar Times from publishing documents; says he intended ultimately to assume responsibility for his activities; discusses his motives in distributing documents
ACTION BY GRAVEL VEXES SENATORS; But No Disciplinary Action Against Him Is Expected Gravel's Action Vexes Many Senators
Date: 01 July 1971
By JOHN W. FINNEYSpecial to The New York Times
John FINNEYSpecial
many Sens privately express shock and chagrin at Gravel's release of parts of Pentagon study but no disciplinary action against him is likely; Sen Scott suggests that Dem majority determine if Gravel violated Sen rule barring Sens from making pub confidential data obtained from Exec branch; Mansfield says he will have 'friendly talk' with Gravel; says he has no intention of pressing censure charges; Sen leadership had begun parliamentary move to bar Gravel from reading more excerpts from Sen floor but Gravel failed to appear
DECISION ON PAPERS IS HAILED IN JAPAN
Date: 02 July 1971
Special to The New York Times
Japanese press gives Sup Ct decision banner headlines and devotes several pages to extensive analysis of issues involved
Aftermath of Decision; Some, but Not All, of the Issues in Vietnam Papers Case Are Resolved
Date: 01 July 1971
By MAX FRANKELSpecial to The New York Times
M Frankel analyzes implications of Sup Ct decision; discusses views expressed by individual Justices
Contempt for the Constitution
Date: 02 July 1971
ed urges HR reject Commerce Com's recommendation for contempt of Cong citation against CBS and Stanton
ELLSBERG CALLS DECISION 'GREAT'; But Says Ruling on Vietnam Papers Is Not Surprising
Date: 01 July 1971
By ROBERT REINHOLDSpecial to The New York Times
Ellsberg hails Sup Ct decision
Letter to the Editor 2 -- No Title
Date: 01 July 1971
CHARLES M. MARTIN
lr holds that even had Johnson been candid with public, Amers would have supported escalating war